
Why clean beauty brands must move beyond aesthetics and embrace true sustainabilityDriven by growing demand for non-toxic, sustainable and transparent ingredients, the global clean beauty market is projected to reach $21.29bn by 2030. How trustworthy are beauty brands that seemingly claim to be "clean"? Ahead of Earth Day in April, Nicole Sherwin, founder of Eco Diva Natural, argues that transparency is the name of the game as consumers become increasingly discerning amid heightened scrutiny of greenwashing. ![]() Nicole Sherwin, the founder of South African clean beauty brand Eco Diva Natural. Image supplied. Greenwashing has become one of the most misleading marketing tactics in the beauty industry. Brands use words like “natural,” “clean,” “eco,” and “organic” with very little regulation behind them. A product may contain one botanical extract, yet still be formulated with synthetic fillers, harsh preservatives, or environmentally harmful ingredients; at the same time, the packaging is dressed in earthy colours and botanical imagery designed to signal purity. Consumers are often ‘tricked’ through:
Today’s consumer is far more aware. In the age of greenwashing scrutiny, transparency is no longer a marketing advantage; it is a necessity. Clean beauty brands must move beyond aesthetic sustainability and embrace operational sustainability. This means:
Consumers should feel empowered to ask questions such as:
True clean beauty is about balance, pH integrity, microbiome health, and long-term well-being, for both people and planet. About the authorNicole Sherwin is the founder of Eco Diva Natural. |