
Top stories






More news














What unfolded wasn’t a dialogue but a reputational high-wire act. Trump, ever the disruptor, dominated the room with his well-known playbook: reject facts, provoke controversy, and place himself at the centre of the narrative. Ramaphosa, by contrast, arrived with a message of calm diplomacy, cultural connection, and soft power backed by a diverse South African delegation, including sports legends.
But the mismatch in approach was obvious. As Stephen Grootes noted in his post-meeting analysis, Ramaphosa failed to land his key messages – an essential goal in any major stakeholder engagement.
While Ramaphosa’s composure was admirable, composure without command rarely influences perception. No amount of charm or symbolic gestures, such as “golf diplomacy”, can win over someone who refuses to engage with facts or dialogue in good faith.
So, was this about diplomacy or reputation? If the goal was to shape perception, the result was disappointing. Trump walked away with more soundbytes to reinforce a racially charged, vote-chasing narrative. Ramaphosa, and by extension, South Africa, risk being seen as props in someone else’s political theatre.
For communications professionals, this encounter underscores a central truth: message control is everything, especially when facing a disruptive or hostile audience.
Trump doesn’t operate within conventional diplomatic boundaries. He trades in spectacle and disruption. Meeting this with traditional soft power was a tactical mismatch.
The media focused on Trump’s inflammatory claims, not on trade or cooperation. When entering high-profile engagements, your core message must be unmissable and delivered early.
Gestures like inviting golf legends can only go so far. If they’re not grounded in a clear strategic message, they fade into the background.
Calmness is a strength, but when it replaces assertiveness, it can be mistaken for passivity. Sometimes, leadership requires calling out misinformation with substantial facts to draw a line around the truth.
Bullish communicators, i.e., those who interrupt, dominate, or belittle, pose a specific challenge in PR. Trump exemplifies this by speaking over others, controlling airtime, and undermining opposing views with provocative labels.
With the G20 on the horizon, this could have been a pivotal moment for South Africa to reinforce its relevance on the world stage. Instead, the spotlight was hijacked.
The reality? When faced with someone who refuses to engage in fact-based dialogue, your role isn’t to convince them, it’s to ensure they don’t hijack your narrative.
Ramaphosa showed admirable restraint, but the optics of this Oval Office exchange reinforce an old truth: leadership is not only what you say, but how it’s remembered.
In today’s media-saturated environment, perception drives reputation. Leaders must be both strategists and storytellers. Charm without clarity, diplomacy without direction, and messages without alignment fail to land.
In the presence of a disruptor, your message must be bolder, clearer, and more purposeful than its performance.
Reputation is not built on symbolism, it’s built on what lingers in memory. And right now, the memory left behind is one of imbalance.